A resurfaced story recounted how a woman allegedly cheated on her husband with her boss while they had two children. Unaware of the affair, the husband reportedly sponsored family trips abroad and funded the children’s education. Years later, after the wife traveled to the U.S. and refused to return, she revealed that the children were not his but her boss’s. The revelation allegedly led to the man suffering a stroke and later dying.
As the story trended again, reactions poured in. One shocking comment read, “Marrying a banker has been a major family issue especially on DNA cases… e no get when these bosses won’t want to spread people wives legs.”
This response is problematic because it shifts blame from individual actions to an entire profession. It stereotypes bankers as habitual home wreckers and reduces a complex, tragic situation to occupational prejudice. Such comments distract from accountability and promote harmful generalizations rather than thoughtful discussion.
LINKS
