A tragic post of a soldier’s final chat shook the timeline. He feared dying like most of his intake, planned to resign after losing a friend to terrorists, then days later, became a victim himself. As outrage trended toward the state’s underfunding of the military, a stunning comment surfaced: “Meanwhile na government wey dey fund insurgents in the name of ransom payments.”

The claim drops like cold water—bold, unfiltered, and politically charged. It raises a question many whisper but rarely type, pointing at authorities like the Federal Government of Nigeria and the Nigerian security agencies, suggesting ransom payouts indirectly strengthen insurgents. Whether seen as a desperate critique or a conspiracy-leaning accusation, its impact is the same: a moment that shocks, sticks, and forces reflection on the complex web between governance, ransom policies, and insecurity. Grief once aimed at funding gaps now spills into darker debates about national priorities, accountability, and the unintended cost of negotiating with those who hold the country hostage.

LINKS

https://x.com/Somtolism7/status/1993917064503824824

https://x.com/iOccupyNigeria/status/1994109659016470588

https://x.com/iOccupyNigeria