The post presented a moral scenario about being entrusted with ₦50 million to deposit for a boss who is suddenly reported dead before the transaction is completed. It sparked reactions that exposed how people interpret responsibility, temptation, and accountability.
One response read: “Who am I to reject God’s blessing.”
This comment is troubling because it frames taking someone else’s money as a divine opportunity rather than a breach of trust. By labeling the situation a “blessing,” the speaker attempts to morally justify dishonesty through religious language. This reflects not just unethical intent but also rationalization—recasting wrongdoing as fate or providence. Such thinking is dangerous because it removes personal accountability and can normalize misconduct by portraying it as something sanctioned rather than something clearly wrong.
LINKS
https://x.com/instablog9ja/status/2020591620253794554
