The debate around Pastor Kingsley’s claim that most men would struggle to lead without money took another sharp turn after a new, equally provocative comment surfaced. While some defended traditional gender roles, others pushed back by reframing leadership strictly as a function of financial power.

One shocking response read: “If women can provide the same money you removed then let them lead. Am ready to be a house husband.”

This remark reduces leadership in relationships to economic provision alone, ignoring emotional intelligence, responsibility, vision, and mutual respect. While some praised it as progressive or humorous, critics argued that it reinforces the very materialism the pastor was criticized for. By equating leadership solely with money, the comment sidesteps deeper questions about partnership, shared duties, and evolving gender roles. It highlights how online discourse often swings between extremes, trading one shallow stereotype for another rather than engaging in a nuanced conversation about what healthy leadership in modern relationships truly looks like.

LINKS

https://www.facebook.com/100064596133105/posts/1328834995946359/

https://www.facebook.com/salihu.hussani.2025